Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's global score of 81.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's construction has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it's just a bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a just a bit more pixels per display inch, a little bit larger display and a better 1256 x 2760 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and Motorola Edge 50 Neo count with really similar memory to install applications and games, both have the same internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 27 percent greater battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera and a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.