Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an overall score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's global score of 81.9. These devices use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. Even being the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also older, much heavier and just a little thicker.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760, a just a bit better display pixels density and much more brightness.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a superior camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments and a tinier sensor capturing lower quality pictures, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.