Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting a score of 81.9 against 76.6. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is incredibly newer, lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, counting with a lot of extra features.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density and a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a camera in the back with a higher resolution, a way higher video quality and a way bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.