Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 global score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you a couple nice extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a way newer phone, and it's also just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 4310mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs and a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.