Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's score of 79. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a noticeably newer device, and it's also lighter and a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11, providing the user some additional features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a bit higher amount of pixels in each display inch.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way larger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a back facing camera with more MP.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.