Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-02-21 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.00 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) is a little bit better than HTC U Ultra, having a score of 78.9 against 77. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) is a extremely thinner and notably lighter device than HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory.
HTC U Ultra features a brighter screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher video quality.
HTC U Ultra features a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a way better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.