Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.86 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), with a general score of 83.8 against 78.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a back camera with lot more MP and a lot better video definition. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.