Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), with a general score of 85.5 against 78.9. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14. The Galaxy A51 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a little better screen pixel density.
Galaxy A51 features just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A51 captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a back facing camera with a lower 48 megapixels resolution and a way lower 3840x2160 video resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 15% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.