Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s score of 78.9. Samsung Galaxy A52 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a better memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.