Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) is a little bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), having a general score of 78.9 against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) is a lighter and much thinner phone than the Galaxy A7 (2017). Galaxy A7 (2017) has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a quite smaller screen, a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 3600mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a way higher video definition and a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.