Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), having a general score of 98.9 against 78.9. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024). Both have a 12 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a little larger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.