Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s score of 78.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a better display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite smaller display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a way higher resolution back camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 44 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.