Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-07-07 |
| -- | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), having an 80.4 score against 78.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a better display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher screen pixel density.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way higher resolution camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.