Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2015-08-21 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), getting an 80.2 score against 78.9. Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy Note5 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.