Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), getting a 94.8 score against 78.9. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024). Both have 8 cores and 12 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy S20 counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. Galaxy S20 features more memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) also has higher video frame rates and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.