Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), getting a score of 88.5 against 78.9. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera and a lot higher video definition.
Galaxy Z Flip's memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.