Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), with a global score of 92.3 against 78.9. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit higher display pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) have incredibly similar memory to install games and applications, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4600mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a much better video quality and a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.