Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-20 |
| -- | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| Interstellar Black | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has an overall score of 78.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's score of 76.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) design is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a more recent 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, offering a couple nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a slightly better display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a bit greater display density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because it has a 9% greater battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a way better video definition and a better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.