Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a general score of 88.1 against 86.3. Although Apple iPhone X is a lot older than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's construction is just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little lower screen density, it also counts with a way brighter display and a bigger screen.
IPhone X has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs, a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone X, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.