Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's 80.7 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a a lot newer phone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, but it is a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and video, a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.