Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but they are 0.32inches thick.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations, a lot more mega pixels back camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 22% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.