Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4, having an 86.3 score against 81.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4, but it's somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a greater camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.