Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, with a score of 86.3 against 82.9. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4 XL, but it is a little bit lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low-light images and videos, a lot better 50 MP resolution camera and a much larger camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.