Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction has the same thickness than Google Pixel 4a, but it's incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution, a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.