Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a global score of 87.5 against 86.3. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but it is a little bit lighter.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit lower pixel quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 16% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.