Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro's general score of 86.3. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 5 is incredibly older than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner. The Google Pixel 5 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a quite lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a larger aperture, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.