Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the HTC One M9, having an 86.3 score against 77.7. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a way newer and thinner cellphone than HTC One M9, but it is also heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it gives some nice extra features.
HTC One M9 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bits processor. HTC One M9 counts with a screen that's just as good as Motorola Edge 50 Pro's screen, because although the HTC One M9 has a way smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much more mega pixels back camera, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot larger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 58% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.