Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is better than HTC U11's global score of 77.6. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is a lot newer, but a little bit thicker and just a little heavier than HTC U11. HTC U11 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than HTC U11, because although it has a lot worse pixel quantity per inch in the display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much greater memory to install games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.