Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 14 | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the HTC U11 EYEs's overall score of 76.9. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is newer and a little thinner than HTC U11 EYEs's, but it's also just a little heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with Android 14 operating system, while HTC U11 EYEs works with Android, HTC Sense UI operating system.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better display than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen. HTC U11 EYEs counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a camera with much more MP.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit better battery life than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.