Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than LG G7 Fit, having an 86.3 score against 77. These devices work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction is noticeably newer than LG G7 Fit's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker.
LG G7 Fit features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and much more opaque display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher display density. LG G7 Fit features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and videos, a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.