Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is just a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, getting an 86.3 score against 82.7. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is noticeably newer, just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG G8X ThinQ. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a brighter screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a lot larger sensor and a much larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.