Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than LG K92, getting a overall score of 86.3 against 85.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body is newer, just a little lighter and a little thinner than the LG K92. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
LG K92 counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better looking display than LG K92. Both of them have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a greater pixels quantity per display inch and a display of the same size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG K92, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a slightly better camera than LG K92, because although it has a lower video quality and a camera in the back with a much lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot larger aperture and a way bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.