Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ's overall score of 82.5. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's design is notably newer, but just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a slightly better display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way worse pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. The LG V30S ThinQ has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way larger sensor, a much more mega pixels camera and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features longer battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.