Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is a lot newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower display pixels density and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior storage for applications and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.