Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a general score of 86.3 against 81.2. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, so it provides the user some extra features. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is incredibly newer than the LG V40 ThinQ, it is a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a way lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes much better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a way larger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.