Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's global score of 86.3. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. The LG V60 ThinQ body is a lot older, somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter display than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a way lower 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos and a lot bigger aperture.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.