Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a overall score of 87.1 against 86.3. Although the LG Velvet is older than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's body is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a better display than LG Velvet, although it has a little lower pixels density, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit smaller screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than LG Velvet, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The LG Velvet has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and a higher resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.