Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than Moto Z Force, with an 86.3 score against 75.8. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is newer than the Moto Z Force, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a way worse screen pixel density and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has improved battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.