Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, getting an 86.3 score against 77.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body is much newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's a lot heavier and way thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little sharper display than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and way lesser pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a way larger camera aperture and a much larger back camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.