Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a global score of 86.3 against 79.8. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is extremely newer, just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than Motorola One Hyper. These phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
The Motorola One Hyper features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a back camera with way less megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.