Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is just a bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, having a general score of 86.3 against 80.3. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a newer 14 version and Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction is a lot newer, just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a quite greater number of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a battery performance that's very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Pro one. Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a back camera with much more MP and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.