Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is extremely newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit greater pixels number in each inch in the screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has more internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. They have a 12 GB RAM and 8 cores. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Nubia Red Magic 3S and Motorola Edge 50 Pro both have quite similar cameras, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, a lesser megapixels back facing camera and a lot smaller back camera sensor, it also counts with a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.