Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a general score of 86.3 against 76.2. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is extremely newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it counts with some additional features and better performance.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a really brighter screen and a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola Edge 50 Pro. The nubia Red Magic 5S captures a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a much smaller aperture and a tinier sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, it also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.