Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Ocean |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, with a score of 86.3 against 83.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a much newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 12 GB of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has much lower brightness, and they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro's memory capacity to install games and applications is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Pro one, both have the same 512 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures, a lower video resolution and a camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and videos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.