Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A20s's score of 77. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's design is way newer than the Galaxy A20s's, although it is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A20s, because it has a better display pixel density, a little bigger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A20s features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A20s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a way larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A20s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.