Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A30, having a overall score of 86.3 against 79.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is much newer than Samsung Galaxy A30's, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. Galaxy A30 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a quite lower display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because it has a lot higher (4K) video quality, a much larger camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.