Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s's 79.8 general score. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Pro is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, it's heavier and a little bit thicker.
Galaxy A30s features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has more pixels per display inch, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A30s, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A30s, because it has a much better video quality, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.