Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A31, getting an 86.3 score against 81.3. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Pro is just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A31, it's just a little thinner and also newer.
Galaxy A31 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a little bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a more mega pixels back facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor and a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A31 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.