Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, getting an 86.3 score against 82. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11, offering a couple additional features and performance tweaks. Galaxy A32 LTE Only features an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a little worse display density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a quite bigger display and a way brighter display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.