Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A41's 81.7 global score. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a newer 14 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's design is much newer, but heavier and just a little thicker than Galaxy A41.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit lower pixel number per display inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A41, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A41, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with more megapixels and a much bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.